Quote:
Originally Posted by AirlinesMustPay
You can say Montreal convention or Warsaw convention. The Montreal protocol is an amendment of the WArsaw convention.
|
Wrong. It is not!
Quote:
Originally Posted by AirlinesMustPay
The Warsaw convention still applies to those countries that are not signatories to the Montreal protocol. I was responding to an OP this morning from Beirut. Her country, Lebanon, has not ratified the Montreal protocol, so what would apply to her case is the Warsaw Convention as amended at the Hague.
|
Wrong again. Not only is a baggage claim filed with the last airline one travels on, but the airline she flew to the EU on is EU based. All EU nations are signatories to the Montreal Convention.
There are even a few countries that have adopted only the unamended Warsaw convention of 1929, and none of the amendments. For those countries, what would apply is the unamended Warsaw convention of 1929.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AirlinesMustPay
You say that the Warsaw Convention and Montreal Convention do not address delay. What utter nonsense!! What utter nonsense!! Look at Article 19 of the unamended Warsaw Convention, the Hague amendment, the Guadalajara Amendment and the Montreal protocol. They all say: "The carrier is liable for delay."
|
Why bother looking at a document drafted when trans-oceanic service was on clippers which had to make multiple stops en route in order to reach their destinations. You are a quack and a fraud and anyone who even considers retaining your services is throwing their money away.
Nice try...Sunil! Yes, I said it and I'm exposing you for the fraud you are. Selling your "strategies to sue the airlines" over the internet. Tell us the truth, Sunil. Is your internet business your only source of income now? Because I can do a little Googling to find out just how many countries you've been dis-barred in! You were already banned once from this website for spamming. Take your quack legal advise elsewhere. You've shown your incompetence here and we're sick of it.