Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Bob
First they didn't dump him in houston, he had to go there and connect. He says so in his complaint.
(heh who's drunk off a cocktail now...... well it's still me, but that's beside the point). And since the OP missed his connection (not dumped), they placed him in a motel (or hotel we don't really know for sure other than the OP's statement), gave him a dinner voucher, and rebooked him the next day.
So again, what did they do that was so wrong, jim? His only major issue is that he didn't get a first class upgrade. That's it. Did they get him to Buenos Aires? Yes. Not at the time he would have liked, i would agree with that, but they did get him there. Was it a mechanical delay? We honestly don't know, because he didn't post any flight details, which the MODS even suggest they post to help their complaint. So we don't have the full story.
Oh and that analogy is beyong bad, probably one of your worst yet. And really I think the analogies need to stop because they can be interpreted in different ways. However because you called me handsome i'll let it slide (hey i'm old and grey, i'll take the compliments when I can get them), and just go back to my cocktail. It is the weekend, plus its frosty outside so I think a nice glass of Port will do nicely.
|
I don't understand all these playing with words that Silent Bob comes up with. Th OP was effectively "dumped" there having left him there when he was supposed to just make a connection. And Mr Bob, like his nutty friends (alter egos) Mars and Mickey, once again side with the airline.
This person is entitled to much more than just a hotel and meal voucher. He lost a day at Buenos Aires and lost sleep as a result of the delay. He is entitled to recover for that and if the airline was smart, although they did not have to upgrade him, it is an easy way of compensating him if there was room in first class.
They prefer not to compensate and have their drunken stooges come in here (I wonder if they get paid for doing this) to defend them.