Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Judge
Gonna get???? I went back through the thread and these were some of the things I found.
I fully expect the offending party to verbally attack me, just a guy who pointed out what was said. Hopefully the admin here can straighten out this situation.
|
Judge, why would I verbally attack you? You have not said anything that is a lie, unlike my nauseating friends Madman Marz and his Drunken Master. I am not sure what has offended you. I have not used any obscenities or vulgarities. True enough I may have made them feel like dirt, but they have deserved it. Madman Marz said that the Warsaw Convention states that the OP was fairly compensated. I asked him what article of the Warsaw convention was saying that and he could not answer. I conclude this is a deliberate lie intended to mislead the Op. The Warsaw Convention says no such thing. The Warsaw Convention is a short document of a few pages written in simple language that even a Dope like him should understand.
OPs come on this site for advice and ideas on how to proceed. Since you have come in to defend them or at least to comment on how I have answered them, what excuse do you offer for this deliberate lie by Madman Marz. I said, "If you can tell a LIE like that on this site, obviously designed to mislead, you are nothing but a disgusting gob of dog vomit"
When the Op sees someone saying that the Warsaw Convention says he has been fully compensated, he may give up on his claim, not realising that the poster is lying. What the Administrators of this site shoudl be concerned about is not who is insulting who, but that the OPs who complain get advice that is not comprised of lies.
What if I call them those names? What do you think of a wacko who would say that if is car battery goes dead on him it is not his fault. Maybe his mommy bought him the car and maintains it. But no responsble car owner would say that. As an airline employee have you ever heard the airline say that delays were due to the fault of Boeing and Airbus. With no evidence that the mechanical delay was due to a design fault, wouldn't you agree with me that only a numbskull would make such a statement? Ok you are too polite to call him a numbskull, but do you disagree that those are very irresponsible statements to make. Who maintains aircrafts?
It is one thing to support airlines, but airline sympathisers need to be truthful and avoid talking absolute garbage like mechanical delays are Boeing's fault.
Apart from Marz's lie about the Warsaw Convention, Bob the Drunk, also called Drunken Master (the guy admits he is a drunk, so what's your problem?) sought to say that the OP has no evidence that the pilot said it was a computer problem.
The OP says that the airlines are calling their pilot a liar. What has escaped this drunk dumbell is that these things are recorded. In another thread he had to be told by another poster that gate announcements are recorded. Here I had to tell him that cockpit announcements are recorded. In fact everything that is said in the cockpit is heard by the control tower. Is it also your position that lies need to be told on behalf of the airline in defending the claim?
Do you see now that the persons the moderators need to censure are these two lying lunatics? This is a site to give assistance to people with complaints against airlines, and while posters like me are trying to assist the OP, you get these sleazy scatterbrained slimeballs coming in here to try to stall the OP's claim with lies.
And instead of telling them about their lies, you are seeking to comment on my language.
By the way Madman Marz doesn't mind being called a stooge. He said as much and he thinks it is something good. When i told him the Wikipedia definition, his reaction was Wikipedia has mistakes. So if Mr Madman Marz likes the names, what is your problem.
What you should do is tell your loco friends to "shape up or ship out". I know if I had any lying tricksters on any of my golden voyages, I would surely have made them walk the plank into the Arabian Sea.