I don't know where it is implied she was not allowed to eat or should have bought everyone else a Subway sandwich.
I think his point was simply this: he was promised a meal, so did not eat or take anything on the plane in anticipation of what was on his confirmation. He was not given a meal, so was hungry. The FA shrugged and said there is nothing she can do about it sorry, write to the airline. Then ate her subway in front of him while he starved.
What is wrong with that observation? He is not saying she shouldn't eat it, nor that she should buy him one. Just that he was hungry, anticipated a meal and instead of getting one, he had to sit and watch the FA chow down on hers.
|