Quote:
Originally Posted by stevicus
The figure for that nine-month period is slightly higher, at 3.49 per 1000 passengers (nearly 1.5 million pieces of mishandled luggage)
|
Very true.. 1.5 million is a lot as a stand-alone number, but again extrapolate that, it's 1.5 million out of how many?______ million
S
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevicus
What might be more helpful is if they showed this data and compared it with the actual number of people who checked their baggage
|
I'd agree with this. It would give a more accurate picture. But I suspect that it would be a somewhat logistical nightmare to drill-down to this data level.
Sure the majority of people would be easy to tally-- those who checked a bag at the main counters at their origins.. but to fair and accurate, you should also include those who checked (or were forced to) a bag plane-side. Many of these bags use manually written 'tags' issued plane-side may not ever get entered into the passengers reservations data...
My only issue here is if we're going to change how the data is collected, I think that the data needs to be collected in a manner that's fair, unbiased and actually shows the complete picture, whatever it may be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevicus
Since they started charging fees for baggage, I take that as an indication that handling baggage is something that's either too much trouble for the airlines or that it's no longer cost-effective to handle both passengers and baggage at the same time.
|
Maybe.. maybe not.. To me, to make this claim on an objective level, you'd need to go back and take a reasonable data sampling from time periods
before bag fees were introduced and an equal data sampling from time periods
after the fees were introduced and compare like-to-like data.