[Butch Cassidy Slept Here]

I've stated very clearly that when you post useful advice…

Jetliner, and his gang, will be the final arbiter of what is “…useful advice…”

you take anything that is said against the airlines at face value

In addition to the newsletter of the Air Transport Association; “The Wall Street Journal,” and other “Murdoch” rags, can you name a publication which, in your view, does NOT “…take anything…at face value…”

you don't seem to have a real true reason for not liking the airlines

Jetliner, are US-based airlines the only people who, in your view, are allowed to crap on the Constitution? Or, is this thinking wider than you’re letting-on?? Is it possible, in your mind, for an airline to do ANYTHING that is unacceptable?? I wonder.

By the way, do you, actually, live in the USA?? Are you a “skin head?”

but not once do you post something that happened to you.

Hey, that’s one way of silencing comments you don’t like. So much for relying on the media. Again, if I quote, only, from the Wall Street Journal; the Atlanta Journal Constitution, and similar publications, will THAT be ok??

Jetliner, what if I make a comment on that bogus awards ceremony American Air held for some employees within the past year? Does this ruling of your’s still apply? A flight attendant, who was honored in that ceremony, said the purpose of the occasion was simply to provide a publicity cover for the death of a Hatian woman at the hands of an indifferent American Air crew. When the US Supreme Court rules in favor of the deceased’s estate, what are you going to do? Try to get the Constitution amended? Big problem however: You deny the existence of the Constitution.

There's a saying that if you repeat the same lie long enough, people will believe it.

I see you’re an avid reader of my posts on the other board. Rather than plagerizing, don’t I get credit for that statement??

You know, that door swings both ways. Hopefully, your posts will have everyone believing that all workers, of US-based airlines, are, again, the reincarnation of Mother Theresa; that my belief in the existence of something called civil rights is simply the result of one of the following impairments: A: you are drunk, B: you have a brain tumor, or C: you just don't read.

he basically hijacked that board.

I don’t think so. However it’s obvious that is what you, and your friends, have done on this board.

Again, Jetliner, you and your friends have a very well funded Air Transport Association (“ATA”), and similar groups, to advocate the concerns of airline managements and yourself. The ATA has a well-paid spokesman—a former PR manager for US Airways. Those on this board, who oppose what you stand for, have Kate Hanni (a passenger rights advocate), and Dianna Fairechild, a former Pan Am & United flight attendant, to voice their concerns. Neither of these people can claim six-figure salaries. Indeed, Kate took-out a second mortgage on her home to finance her campaign (in addition to soliciting donations.) On our side, there are no well-paid spokespeople or lobbyists. Yet with all the slick news releases, and PR spin, the ATA regularly dishes-out you and your friends see the need to take things a step further—silence the opposition. Or, at least, try to. It’s a lot like the Tammany Hall thugs who would harass the opposition candidates, in New York City, during the early part of the 20th century.

In anticipation of your self-righteous rant: No, I do not believe you, or anyone else on here, is on the payroll of the ATA. You, and your friends, are just in bed with them—big time!