Actually, picking holes in a complaint doesn't defeat the purpose of the forum, that's what a forum is all about. it's what begins and ends debates. Sometimes it ends where everyone agrees and sometimes it ends where no one agrees, but it ends. If we just accept what's given to us, then where's the debate portion comes in? If no one objects to a post then there would be no need for a debate true? There would be no need for airline employees or "sympathizers" to be here.
This "particular" forum" just happens to be about Airline Complaints. There's no fault as to why there are more pro vs con, there have been more than enough who have signed up to post their complaints but most have moved on. No one chased them away, no one told them to leave, they simply chose not to come back. And those that were actually chased away, was done so for a reason: because their posts were objectionable. But if ALL those posters did in fact stay, then the odds would be in favor of those who are anti-airline, not pro.
But to defend my position, I don't pretend to know the situation, I posted what i did, with no regrets, because I have seen it. As a frequent flyer I have watched people get arrested, denied boarding, or run late for a flight only to be told "sorry, no dice". Heck I used to be that guy, but I learned to mellow, because I realized that "Stuff happens" and I don't try to push blame, I just wanna get to where I am going. Hey I don't disagree with anyone that airline customer service needs some serious work, but it goes both ways. Eventhough we are the paying customers, we are paying the airlines to take us from point A to point B, not to abuse other human beings.
To restate, i did not belittle the OP, i did not abuse the OP, I merely questioned his post and if that's wrong then as another posted stated: why have the option to reply?
|