OK - I'll give you one more go! Whether I can prove it or not is not, for me at least, an issue. It was, and still is, my opinion that Air France used the excuse of a lightning strike in order to avoid the financial responsibilities that a delay due to a technical fault (which is what they announced it to be) would have subjected them to. I was there and you were not. If for one moment you imagine that your beloved airlines are above such underhanded tactics then you are the alien from outer space - very droll, by the way. It was totally clear to me that they were bull****ting. But as I say, it is only my opinion and I am entitled to express my opinion and I will do so whenever I see fit. So - it was not an accusation but my expressed opinion. Their immediate and over reaction to my opinion only helped to confirm what I and others felt sure of. As I said - you were not there and so know absolutely nothing about it except what I tell you.
I did not say that you were an inexperienced traveler - I have no idea how well traveled you are - nor do I care. I did group you with what I called 'sheep' as that is the opinion I have of you from your comments. After reading your latest blurb, I stand by that opinion.
I don't "keep bringing up the virgin flight" - you brought up the Virgin flight by posting on here - I mention what I need to about it in order to make my point! If you couldn't care less about what happened to you on your Virgin flight then why did you bother to write about it? I care very much about what happens.
If you just carry on making excuses for them and letting them treat you and your fellow travelers in the same way then it becomes your fault.
Maybe on my return flight with Air France they will be delayed - as you suggest - but you can bet your bottom cookie that I will be right in there holding them accountable. I might even say you said 'Hi' - I can just hear their reply now - "Ahhh... if only they were all like him."
Dont get caught with your hand in the cookie jar!
Adios
|