[Jetliner]

Originally Posted by LuLou

My case is that there is witnesses, NOT Whether there are cameras or not. You are way OFF TRACK.

Wait, I'm confused by that. Why?

Originally Posted by LuLou

I am in the process of working with the AirTran customer complaint department with Airtran Airlines right now from this incident that is on video from the cabin cameras, as well as 2 non related, witnesses.

Originally Posted by LuLou

This is an article from 8+ YRS Ago. All planes have had cameras since 03', if American can load camera's on their entire fleet in 3 months, all planes WILL Have camera's installed when mfg.
They, AirTran's only defense is that they are reviewing the films to say it never happened. I have witnesses that saw it happen and that will be enough to pursue this.

Bolds are mine for emphasis. You are making statements saying that there was a cabin camera and Air Tran is reviewing that camera, but now that you have been called out on that you are back peddling???

The fact is there are no cameras on planes other than jet blue, and with that your credibility of your story is lacking.

In the mean time I'm done with this thread. I'm not feeding into this line of crap any further. This is almost as bad as the person who claims they caught some part flying off of a Southwest flight on camera twice, which was proven to be something on their lens and they still insisted otherwise.

[putinontheritz]

Originally Posted by Jetliner

Wait, I'm confused by that. Why?





Bolds are mine for emphasis. You are making statements saying that there was a cabin camera and Air Tran is reviewing that camera, but now that you have been called out on that you are back peddling???

The fact is there are no cameras on planes other than jet blue, and with that your credibility of your story is lacking.

In the mean time I'm done with this thread. I'm not feeding into this line of crap any further. This is almost as bad as the person who claims they caught some part flying off of a Southwest flight on camera twice, which was proven to be something on their lens and they still insisted otherwise.

It seems like you are trying too hard to grill the details. AND that you are disgruntled in some way? I see this case as being a lot more serious than the other Fox news story about the lady that did not wake up and was left alone on the plane for a couple hours. The rectification that a jury of peers, if it goes that far, will rule in Lulous favor...........

[Jetliner]

Originally Posted by putinontheritz

It seems like you are trying too hard to grill the details. AND that you are disgruntled in some way?

No, not disgruntled at all. Yes, I was grilling a bit. There is a reason. The OP is claiming that there are definitely cameras on the plane. I know for a fact there are not. I know for a fact that the cameras cannot be placed there without the knowledge of the mechanics or the pilots. Both absolutely need to know about every system on that aircraft. But the OP is trying to say that Air Tran is telling him/her that they will look at the cameras. So it's simply a matter of them making a claim that is simply not true, but still trying to perpetuate the lie.