[anguished]

Additionally, A320FAN, you never addressed the issue of false advertising and the fact that Southwest has the ability to rebook those seats with no financial loss to themselves. Why don't they do that, instead of demanding we pay $3099. for seats we cannot use. You very smoothly gloss over those points and put up diversionary issues. If you are paid to monitor these websites and reply to peoples issues, the money could be better used to help people instead of profit from their misfortunes.

[A320FAN]

Originally Posted by anguished

Additionally, A320FAN, you never addressed the issue of false advertising and the fact that Southwest has the ability to rebook those seats with no financial loss to themselves. Why don't they do that, instead of demanding we pay $3099. for seats we cannot use. You very smoothly gloss over those points and put up diversionary issues. If you are paid to monitor these websites and reply to peoples issues, the money could be better used to help people instead of profit from their misfortunes.

I am not paid to monitor these site. I am paid $19.00 (after 9 1/2 years with the company) an hour to board 150 passengers on an airplane, check them in at the ticket counter and dispatch flights on a daily basis. I meet and greet domestic and occasionaly an SDQ (Santo Domingo) flight here and there.

Did you ever begin to think that maybe just maybe it is NOT Southwest, but their business partner the credit card in which you have your Rapid Rewards memship through. They can advertise what they want, as long as Southwest has already advised them of what is going on and what is available to them and Southwest is willing to provide.