[jimworcs]

A320,
The link you provide proves what? Í stated that the ADA is not the primary act relating to the rights of customers to bring a service animal on board. You helpfully provided a link confirming this

The links states that passengers have the right to bring their animal into the cabin. This is precisely my point. Although the animal cannot be kept in an aisle blocking egress, the Act does not require the animal to be restrained or kept in a container which is secured. My point is that this is fundamentally unsafe. In an accident such as United in Sioux City, or in an fire event, in which the danger is smoke inhalation and requires rapid evacuation, the potential to have an unrestrained dog on the loose places other passengers at risk. I don't think that is justified and think this legislation is misguided and frankly often misused.