Notices

 
Tools...
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old Aug 17, 2009, 2:39 AM
Butch Cassidy Slept Here Butch Cassidy Slept Here is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nearest Airports: COD, BIL, WRL
Posts: 577
Default Names, or nothing, are ok under the status quo

The employee number is so incredibly impersonal and so easy to get wrong.

Impersonal? Absolutely. I still think it’s better than first names. Again, badge numbers have been used by police for years. And judging from the pay-outs some cities have made on lawsuit settlements it sounds like badge numbers are copied-down correctly. Also, a number is a better device to use in a scenario where flight attendants would be licensed by the DOT. A flight attendant might work for two, three or more airlines during his/her career. At least some do to my understanding. A single DOT-assigned number would enable the tracking of complaints, against a given flight attendant, from one airline to the next.

The status quo of first names, or no names and just appearances (the lady with the big wart on her forehead!), is probably ok in the absence of DOT licensing. Again, under the current state of affairs, after drug trafficking, setting the plane afire, and feeding a 4-year old passenger vodka, are considered, it seems there is little in the way of bad behavior, on the part of a flight attendant, that would, in the view of most US-based airlines, be a basis for termination.

As to the concept of flight attendants being on board only for safe evacuations and other safety issues: I think that’s a GREAT idea! If you just want to check on customers who are smoking; those who won’t sit-down; and those who are commiting “potty crime” (crapping outside your ticketed class)—NO PROBLEM. I think I can, somehow, get by without a lukewarm “Budget Gormet” tv dinner for lunch. I’ll take my chances with Chick-A-Fill, or Cinabun in the terminal concourse. It would be a great flight—I wouldn’t have to look at your face, and vice versa.

The problem is flight attendants are NOT just safety officers. Too many customers are painfully aware of that. Flight attendants are baby police: If you’re 6 years old, and say “bye, bye plane” too many times, you and Mommy are history! Flight attendants are literary police: Have a t-shirt on with anything written in Arabic? You’re dead meat! Wearing a t-shirt with a political statement—assuming it’s not favoring a politician to whom the airline donated money? You’re walking! Kissing may, or may not, be allowed. Flight attendants check for the “correct” gender combination as part of their “safety” duties, of course!

Last edited by Butch Cassidy Slept Here; Aug 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM.
 

More options...
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Complaint Complaint Author Forum Replies Last Post
In-flight Issue JetBlue Airways - rude flight attendant tang JetBlue Airways Complaints 12 Dec 27, 2011 3:45 PM
Customer Service FLIGHT ATTENDANT RAGE Brenda Price American Airlines Complaints 4 Jun 7, 2011 1:20 AM
In-flight Issue Rude flight attendant riduculed me Maria Fernandes Southwest Airlines Complaints 1 Mar 31, 2011 4:27 AM
In-flight Issue Discriminated by flight attendant among other issues bun Southwest Airlines Complaints 3 Aug 10, 2010 3:28 PM
In-flight Issue US Airways: Harassment by Flight Attendant bluewhistler@hotmail.com In-flight Issues 3 Jan 22, 2008 4:36 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:26 PM.

 

About Us

We are the oldest and largest Airline Complaints organization in the world. We have been making your airline complaints matter since 2006. Learn more.

 

Advertising

Advertise with us to reach a highly-targeted audience of airline passengers.

Copyright © 2006 - 2023